Critical Race Theory: What is it Really?

Peter Aitken, Ph.D.

Critical Race Theory (CRT) and the separate but related 1619 Project have been getting a lot of press lately, particularly as regards the teaching of American History in public schools. Unfortunately, many people, almost entirely on the political right, do not have even a small clue as to what CRT actually is and how it would affect teaching. What follows is a short piece I wrote for the local paper, the Raleigh News and Observer, in hopes of providing some clarity. See below for a link to another essay on the same topic.

Many Republican-led state legislatures are rushing to ban the use of Critical Race Theory in public schools. They apparently have no understanding of CRT and what it means for the teaching of history. If they do, in fact, understand CRT and still oppose it, it reflects very poorly on them.

CRT is a highly abstruse theory meant to inform academic historical scholarship. But it, and the separate but related 1619 Project, have been brought to bear on the teaching of American History in public schools. What does this mean in practical terms? It has nothing to do with shaming white people or teaching students to hate their country. It most certainly has nothing to do with Marxism. These are all conservative fabrications, bugaboos created to scare people.

In relation to education, CRT asks nothing more than when teaching American history, the crucial roles that slavery and racial discrimination played, and continue to play, must be part of it, taught accurately and without regard to political opinions. How might this affect teaching?

Yes, the many good things about this country must be taught, too. But the point of teaching history should be to teach what actually happened, with accuracy and without blame or guilt. Only by understanding how we got here can we move on to a better future.

Professor Michael Schwalbe of NC State University wrote an informative essay on this topic.